Was the Mandatory Use of the SARS-CoV-2 modRNA Shot Violating the 4th Amendment?

Is the Mandatory use of the SARS-CoV-2 modRNA Shot a Violation of the 4th Amendment?

The 4th amendment, in plain text, is the protection of individuals from illegal search and seizure. Amendment four states:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.[1]

The amendment above is essential for protecting papers and effects against seizures without a warrant. How does this apply to the SAR’s COVID-19 vaccine? The operating mechanism within the SAR’s COVID-19 vaccines is the “nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2.”[2] This white paper has two components. First, the vaccination’s operating mechanism is not a “vaccine that contains only killed or weakened forms of germs like viruses or bacteria.”[3] The working mechanism of modRNA is a synthetic message sent to the cells to encode the viral spike protein. The second part is that, as citizens of the United States, we are protected from illegal seizures. This paper will define seizure as “the action of taking something by force or with legal authority.”[4]

Part 1

Understanding how the mRNA messaging system works is essential to understand what is happening with the modRNA once it enters the body. The National Human Genome Research Institute defines the messenger RNA as:

Messenger RNA (mRNA) is a single-stranded RNA molecule complementary to one of the DNA strands of a gene. The mRNA is an RNA version of the gene that leaves the cell nucleus and moves to the cytoplasm, where proteins are made. During protein synthesis, an organelle called a ribosome moves along the mRNA reads its base sequence and uses the genetic code to translate each three-base triplet, or codon, into its corresponding amino acid.[5]

As the quote above defines, the mRNA is a message, i.e., information. It is important to remember that a message is a huge departure from past vaccines, which the WHO defined as a dead or weakened virus or bacteria, neither of which apply to an mRNA vaccine. Should an mRNA vaccine even be considered a vaccine because it does not even meet the WHO’s definition of a vaccine? This question is beyond this paper’s scope but highlights a vast gulf between a dead or weakened germ and a coded message.

Every aspect of the modRNA vaccine is the work of intelligent design in that the modRNA is designed by the drug manufacturer to encode a message to the cell to encode/produce the viral spike protein. We could look at this from a manufacturing standpoint. If your cell was a car factory producing cars, engineers could create new plans for the car model. The new plans could then be implemented. The factory would then create the cars to the engineer’s new specifications. While the picture above might be confusing, I hope this analogy makes it easier to understand.

There is no problem with the voluntary acceptance of the modRNA vaccine because you accept the engineer’s synthetic instructions to your cells. This is the power of choice. When you take the modRNA, you accept that the message sent to your cells is working as intended and that the engineer of the modRNA knows what they are doing to produce the desired outcome. The problem comes from the distrust by the public that was earned by the drug industry and the producers of the modRNA. The distrust extends to officials mandating the vaccine for continued employment and access to various venues. How was this distrust earned? Distrust of the pharmacological industry is represented in the following drugs we approved and removed from public use. Quaaludes, DES, Vioxx, and thalidomide, to name a few. There is quite an extensive list of failures by drug companies. The FDA approved these drugs in many cases. You can access the website in the footnotes below.[6] The website I included has 35 drugs approved and then pulled from the market by the FDA for various reasons. On the government side, the US government and different states have a long history of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical choice and one that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This type of ethical thinking ignores individual rights, freedoms, and a moral conscience because they do not contribute to the greatest good for the greatest number.

The United States has a long history of abuse of its people, from slavery to indigenous people’s relocation, forced sterilization, and experiments conducted on the general public without their knowledge. Some of the most famous include the Tuskegee Study, California’s Asexualization Acts, and Project MKUltra. [7] [8] [9] Wikipedia has an extensive list of unethical human experiments. Typically, I don’t cite Wikipedia, but it highlights the magnitude of unethical experimentation in this instance.[10] The evidence is overwhelming and points to the utilitarianism mentioned above. The evidence cited produces a reasonable doubt about the intentions of both the drug manufacturers and government officials. Therefore, it is reasonable to remain skeptical as to the efficacy of the modRNA. An mRNA rabies vaccine study was conducted over three years with a group of 101 participants. I will include the findings here:

Findings: Between Oct 21, 2013, and Jan 11, 2016, we enrolled and vaccinated 101 participants with 306 doses of mRNA (80-640 μg) by needle-syringe (18 intradermally and 24 intramuscularly) or needle-free devices (46 intradermally and 13 intramuscularly). In the seven days post-vaccination, 60 (94%) of 64 intradermally vaccinated participants and 36 (97%) of 37 intramuscularly vaccinated participants reported solicited injection site reactions and 50 (78%) of 64 intradermally vaccinated participants, and 29 (78%) of 37 intramuscularly vaccinated participants reported solicited systemic adverse events, including ten grade 3 events. One unexpected, possibly related, serious adverse reaction that occurred seven days after a 640 μg intramuscular dose resolved without sequelae. mRNA vaccination by needle-free intradermal or intramuscular device injection-induced virus-neutralizing antibody titres of 0·5 IU/mL or more across dose levels and schedules in 32 (71%) of 45 participants given 80 μg or 160 μg CV7201 doses intradermally and six (46%) of 13 participants given 200 μg or 400 μg CV7201 doses intramuscularly. One year later, eight (57%) of 14 participants boosted with an 80 μg needle-free intradermal dose of CV7201 achieved titres of 0·5 IU/mL or more. Conversely, intradermal or intramuscular needle-syringe injection was ineffective, with only one participant (who received 320 μg intradermally) showing a detectable immune response.

Interpretation: This first-ever demonstration in human beings shows that a prophylactic mRNA-based candidate vaccine can induce boostable functional antibodies against a viral antigen when administered with a needle-free device, although not when injected by a needle syringe. The vaccine was generally safe with a reasonable tolerability profile.[11]

There were two interesting points from this study about 10% had a grade three event, defined as “Severe symptoms causing an inability to perform usual social & functional activities with intervention or hospitalization indicated.”[12] The second was that the needle-syringe injection was ineffective at delivering functional antibodies. This is not to say that the COVID-19 injection method would experience the same results, but it is telling.

Let’s loosely translate the results of this study due to the unknowns involved between the two mRNA injections. If the COVID mRNA had the same grade three event correlation, that would mean of the 333,201,543 Americans, 33 million would have grade three events. Let’s ask a hypothetical question. Would you take Tylenol if there were a 10% chance you would suffer a grade three event? I would have a hard time taking Tylenol with those odds. The 10% odds coupled with the fact that at my age and younger, you run a very low risk of death from COVID-19.[13] [14] In addition, there is better immunity from natural infection and recovery.[15] Keep in mind that drug manufacturers cannot be sued in the United States per the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.[16] So if you are part of that 10% injured, your only recourse is to apply for redress from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).[17] Finally, there is a growing body of anecdotal and supported evidence of patients who suffered vaccine damage.[18] So far, the best-supported site has been C19 Vax Reactions which has a very long citation list of adverse reactions from reputable sources.[19]

I have provided a wealth of evidence to support my thesis that the modRNA lacks the certainty required to overcome the decades of mistrust of drug manufacturers and the government. I specifically used a non-COVID mRNA injection to hopefully stay out of the politically charged area of COVID reporting and because adverse COVID effects would not be under laboratory conditions. I have included the CDC Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine reaction page nonetheless.[20]

Part 1 Conclusion

In conclusion, the modRNA is a synthetic message sent to the cells to produce the spike protein with the intended result of producing COVID-19 antibodies with minimal side effects. The synthetic message is produced by a drug company whose industry has a long history of failures and recalls and requires the absolute trust of the individual receiving the injection. This trust must exist in a growing body of evidence that shows grade-three events taking place. There is possible evidence that there is more than just grade three evidence, but it would require more time and a good bit of data mining to draw a definitive conclusion on the totality of adverse reactions. My case is not to prove beyond a reasonable doubt but to build a case with enough evidence to support a wait-and-see attitude on the long-term veracity of modRNA therapy. Because natural immunity provides a better immune response, it is possible to wait for more evidence and see the long-term viability of modRNA injections.

Part 2

We have now established that the modRNA injection is a synthetic message, not a weakened virus or bacteria. The rest of this paper will focus specifically on the Pfizer BioNTech COMIRNATY. With the Pfizer modRNA FDA approval, a new raft of mandatory vaccinations from various organizations emerged. The acceptance of trust between the drug manufacturers and the injected has become the coercion and co-opting of the unwilling despite the growing evidence showing adverse reactions. Also included is the short-term protection evidence by the increasing need for a 3rd modRNA injection.[21] A third injection coupled with a new mask mandate elucidates the growing public mistrust of government officials. The science, suspicion, and mandates are coming to a head with violating fundamental civil rights. The result could mean the loss of jobs for potentially millions of Americans.

I’ll go ahead and lay out my case for the Fourth Amendment violation. According to the Constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.”[22] The government mandate of the modRNA injection violates a person’s most personal information. The same information that tells a person’s cell what to do. As has been established by Pfizer’s own words, “nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2.” The operative word here is encoding, which is defined as “to convert (something, such as a body of information) from one system of communication into another.”[23] This definition is devastating. The Pfizer modRNA shot encodes a cell to produce the spike protein against the cell’s and the mandated individual’s will. If left uncoded, the cell would never make the spike protein.

Let’s let that sink in for a bit. The Pfizer modRNA shot violates the security of the body’s natural messaging system. The idea of cell message integrity cuts to the heart of the argument. Is a person under the Fourth Amendment secure in their cell message integrity? The Pfizer modRNA seizes the means of production of the cell and encodes the cell to produce the spike protein. This is fine for the willing individual as they have voluntarily surrendered the cell’s means of production for the duration of the message. But, the violation remains for the individual who is coerced either by the government directly or through the threat of termination. Surrender your cell’s means of production or face termination. The modRNA stands different from vaccines, as illustrated above because typical vaccines allow your body to produce the required antibodies not to take over your cell.

The surrender of your cell’s means of production comes full circle with utilitarianism. The argument for coercion and mandatory vaccination is that the needs of the collective outweigh the needs of the individual. Is salus populi supreme lex: the health of the people is the supreme law? Even if the health of the individual being is compromised? Even if the cure is detrimental to a great many individuals, not just one. How many damaged or dead individuals does it take for a utilitarian to recognize the many are being damaged? In hyper utilitarian societies, i.e., most communist states, the answer is never. The collective will always supersede the individual. The point is illustrated by the death of millions at the hands of communist regimes. The state reigns supreme, and the individual is crushed under the boot of the collective. This is the end state of mandates—the death of individualism and the rise of collectivism down to the cellular level. You no longer have a say in what your own body produces. We should not be surprised as recently as May, the University of Pittsburgh used dead babies to conduct research.[24] Life is cheap, so why should your proper cell message integrity matter? Why should any of the Bill of Rights matter? The collective reigns supreme. Or is this the fight of our time? Our struggle for the fundamental right of cell production.

I am a very poor armchair lawyer, and my Fourth Amendment argument might not have a leg to stand on. Still, it does not negate the fact that the government, through coercion, decides the means of production at the cellular level for the collective good. Are we going to stand by and accept the loss of bodily autonomy to shaky science and hyper-utilitarian bureaucrats? I know I have made my decision, my line in the sand. Make no mistake. This is the fight of our generation. Stand together in rejecting the seizure of one of the last vestiges of freedom, our very cells, and our say in what we put in our bodies. Or cede what is left of our autonomy and freedom to the collective will of the state. Destined to lie in a vat of purple ooze as every last bit of useful bodily production is used for the benefit of the collective. While my Matrix analogy might be a bit over the top, it is helpful to illustrate the end state of a utilitarian technocracy where you no longer have bodily autonomy as the government can force your body to produce whatever it deems useful. Even in history’s most repressive, destructive empires, individuals could not have their internal cellular process co-opted by the state. We might not even have this luxury soon.

Part 2 Conclusion

The fourth amendment should protect cell message integrity as it is core to a person’s proper function of cellular production. The Pfizer modRNA is a synthetic message that encodes the cell to produce a spike protein against the individual’s will if the individual has not willingly accepted the modRNA shot. The coercion represented in the modRNA mandate is the government’s intent to seize a person’s cellular production. The seizure of the cell’s output is no different than seizing a car company manufacturing facility. If left alone, a cell will never produce a spike protein. So, the modRNA shot represents the government taking over the car manufacturing facilities and producing tanks instead of cars. Going forward, will we be a society that acquiesces to the collective good, or do we fight to retain our freedom represented in the core of who we are and our ability to decide what our cells will produce? The science does not support the cooption of my cells for the greater good; therefore, I will not bend to the collective

 

[1] “Fourth Amendment,” Legal Information Institute, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fourth_amendment.

[2] US Department of the Food & Drug Administration, Letter to Ms. Elisa Harkins Pfizer Inc., August 23, 2021, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/media/150386/download.

[3] “Vaccines and immunization: What is vaccination,” World Health Organization, December 30, 2020, updated July 19, 2021, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/vaccines-and-immunization-what-is-vaccination.

[4] “Cambridge Dictionary, s.v. “seizure,” accessed August 23, 2021, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/seizure

[5] Lawrence C. Brody, Ph.D., “Messenger RNA (mRNA),” National Human Genome Research institute, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/messenger-rna.

[6] Procon.org, “FDA-Approved Prescription Drugs Later Pulled from the Market,” Britannica ProCon.org, January 1, 2014, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://prescriptiondrugs.procon.org/fda-approved-prescription-drugs-later-pulled-from-the-market/.

[7] Ada McVean B.Sc., “40 Years of Human Experimentation in America: The Tuskegee Study,” McGill, January 25, 2019, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/history/40-years-human-experimentation-america-tuskegee-study.

[8] Sanjana Manjeshwar, “America’s Forgotten History of Forced Sterilization,” Berkeley Political Review, November 4, 2020, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://bpr.berkeley.edu/2020/11/04/americas-forgotten-history-of-forced-sterilization/

[9] Kat Eschner, “What we Know about the CIA’s Midcentury Mind-Control Project,” Smithsonian Magazine, April 13, 2017, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/what-we-know-about-cias-midcentury-mind-control-project-180962836/.

[10] “Unethical Human Experimentation in the United States,” Wikipedia, Last updated August 23, 2021, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentation_in_the_United_States.

[11] Martin Alberer 1, Ulrike Gnad-Vogt 2, Henoch Sangjoon Hong 2, Keyvan Tadjalli Mehr 2, Linus Backert 3, Greg Finak 4, Raphael Gottardo 4, Mihai Alexandru Bica 2, Aurelio Garofano 2, Sven Dominik Koch 2, Mariola Fotin-Mleczek 2, Ingmar Hoerr 2, Ralf Clemens 2, Frank von Sonnenburg, “Safety and immunogenicity of a mRNA rabies vaccine in healthy adults: and open-label, non-randomised, prospective, first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial,” Lancet, July 25, 2017, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28754494/.

[12] “Division of AIDS (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events,” National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National institutes of Health US Department of Health and Human Services Version 2.1, July 2017, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://rsc.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/corrected-grading-table-v-2-1-with-all-changes-highlighted.pdf.

[13] “Coronavirus Recovery,” WebMD, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.webmd.com/lung/covid-recovery-overview#1-2.

[14] “COVID Pandemic Planning Scenarios,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, March 19, 2021, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html.

[15] “Lasting Immunity found after recovery from COVID-19,” National institutes of Health,” January 26, 2021, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/lasting-immunity-found-after-recovery-covid-19.

[16] National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, H Res 5546, 99^th Congress, HR Rep. 99-908 Part 1, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546.

[17] “Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System,” VAERS, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://vaers.hhs.gov/.

[18] “We want to be heard,” Vax Longhaulers, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.vaxlonghaulers.com/.

[19] “Our Negative Reactions need Positive Actions,” C19 Vax Reactions, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.c19vaxreactions.com/.

[20] “Local Reactions, systemic Reactions, Adverse Events, and Serious Adverse Events: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,

[21] Mark Osborne, Eric Strauss, “Study Shows booster shot after 6 to 12 months likely to provide best protection from COVID-19, Pfizer says,” ABC News, July 8, 2021, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://abcnews.go.com/Health/booster-shot-12-months-provide-best-protection-covid/story?id=78741334.

[22] “Fourth Amendment,” Legal Information Institute, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fourth_amendment.

[23] “Merriam Webster, s.v. “encode,” accessed August 23, 2021, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/seizure.

[24] Madeline Osburn, “University of Pittsburgh Uses Taxpayer-Funded Aborted Babies for Medical Research,” The Federalist, May 7, 2021, accessed August 23, 2021, from https://thefederalist.com/2021/05/07/university-of-pittsburgh-uses-taxpayer-funded-aborted-babies-for-medical-research/.